Weekly Rewind
Progress in streaming local channels: If you’re unwilling or unable to use an antenna for local channels, this week’s TechHive column is for you. It’s all about why, in most markets, live local feeds aren’t part of streaming TV bundles such as Sling TV, PlayStation Vue, and DirecTV Now. Basically, the process for negotiating with these bundlers is different from traditional TV, and national networks and their local broadcast affiliates haven’t always seen eye-to-eye how the deals should work.
There’s hope, though. This week, ABC announced that 160 of its 200 local affiliates are on board with the blanket deals the network has arranged. NBC also announced progress on a similar initiative, while CBS and Fox are reportedly pursuing similar plans. I suspect that by the end of this year, your ablity to get local channels without cable or antenna will be greatly improved.
Amazon’s secret sports advantage: Over at What You Pay For Sports, Dave Warner has a thought-provoking analysis on how Amazon could rival ESPN in carrying live sporting events. Warner notes that Amazon’s $6.4 billion in subscription revenue last year isn’t too far behind ESPN’s $8.5 billion in carriage fees, but with one crucial difference: Amazon Prime subscribers are happy to pay even if they’re not using all its benefits. That’s not the case with cable subscribers, who are increasingly jumping ship and contributing to ESPN’s ongoing misery. As more sports rights deals become available, Amazon could enter the bidding, using Prime as leverage. It’s already done so this year with Thursday Night Football.
What’s remarkable to me is that Amazon Prime is a bundle, but one whose services consist of many other things besides movies and TV shows. And while it’s been a huge success for Amazon, no other company–not Google, Walmart, Apple, Target, or anyone else that might count as a competitor–is doing anything remotely similar.
More Catch-Up
|